i_amthecosmos: (Default)
i_amthecosmos ([personal profile] i_amthecosmos) wrote2010-01-23 03:28 am
Entry tags:

Writer's Block: Forever young?

[Error: unknown template qotd]Well, that's pretty much the recipe for hell there, isn't it? If I was 22 forever, that means I would have kept getting tattoos and having anonamoyus sex with people I didn't care about. I would be running from relationships and me and my husband would have never dated. I would just be running the same loop. I'd be at the clubs right now, getting drunk and trying to think of a story to write, but never actually putting pen to paper.

It would be horrible.

[identity profile] firelily.livejournal.com 2010-01-25 07:15 pm (UTC)(link)
So...if you wouldn't want to be stuck at 22 forever, what age WOULD you choose? They didn't specify it had to be a young age. Could be like, 5 years ago or something.

Personally I would actually love to go back to about 21. Maybe even 20. Yeah, it's mean I could never legally drink, ever, but I had a damn good time my sophomore year of college!

[identity profile] i-amthecosmos.livejournal.com 2010-01-26 04:47 am (UTC)(link)
None, because the payment for this is my memories would stop. Therefore I won't grow. I'll be that age forever and not learn or do anything.

I would much rather grow old.

[identity profile] firelily.livejournal.com 2010-01-26 05:23 am (UTC)(link)
Oooo, I think I misread the prompt. I thought it meant that if I chose to stay at 21, I would have to sacrifice all of my memories that I have currently from 21-30. But when I went back to 21 I'd just stay at 21 forever and from there start to make other memories. That's a whole other ballgame. You lose some of your current memories but you do get to grow and form other memories. Just stuck in the body of a younger person. Which could be good or bad. But yeah, the way you're suggesting it, it's like a Groundhog Day situation, where you really are stuck at one age, never moving past that point. That would probably suck.